Nickel-based dual catalyst systems effective in suppressing carbon dioxide formation during diethylene glycol amination

ABSTRACT

Disclosed is a process for simultaneously producing morpholine and GIGLYCOLAMINE® amine while suppressing CO 2  formation comprising the steps of: 
     reacting anhydrous diethylene glycol with ammonia in the presence of added hydrogen over a dual nickel/ruthenium catalyst system comprising a nickel-based catalyst plus a supported ruthenium catalyst, and 
     isolating said morpholine compound and said DIGLYCOLAMINE® amine compound from the reaction products.

CROSS REFERENCE

This application is related to U.S. Ser. No. 07/543,017 filed June 25, 1990.

Field Of The Invention

This invention relates to the practice of making morpholine from diethylene glycol by an amination reaction. More particularly this invention relates to the use of a dual nickel/ruthenium catalyst system for the selective amination of anhydrous diethylene glycol (DEG) to morpholine plus DIGLYCOLAMINE® amine (DGA) wherein the coproduction of CO₂ is significantly suppressed. Surprisingly, it has been found that only certain combinations of nickel/ruthenium dual catalyst systems are effective in suppressing CO₂ formation during morpholine service.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The practice of making morpholine plus DIGLYCOLAMINE® amine from diethylene glycol and ammonia over an amination catalyst is well-known in the art (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,151,112 (1964). The reaction is generally run in an aqueous environment. The indication is that better productivity could be obtained using an anhydrous feed, since water acts as a diluent and takes up space in the reactor. Whether run under aqueous or anhydrous feed conditions, there are two principal gaseous by-products, methane and carbon dioxide. Under aqueous conditions most of the CO₂ is absorbed into the H₂ O. Under anhydrous feed conditions, even though water is a reaction by-product (e.g. see Equations 1 and 2), the CO₂ will readily react with the excess ammonia to form ammonium bicarbonate and/or ammonium carbamate, both of which in the absence of adequate water diluent, will form solids which precipitate downstream of the amination reactor, in the heat exchanger, etc., causing additional unit maintenance costs and engineering problems. It would be extremely advantageous if it were possible to operate a morpholine/DIGLYCOLAMINE® process using anhydrous diethylene glycol/ammonia feed in such a fashion that CO₂ by-product formation was lowered to below, or close to, threshold levels (i.e.<50 ppm). Such a condition might be achieved by converting said CO₂ to methane (Equation 3), possibly by introducing a methanation catalyst into the process unit, downstream of the diethylene glycol amination step. Particularly useful would be a methanation catalyst that:

a) Lowers the CO₂ concentration in the morpholine/DIGLYCOLAMINE® amine product effluent to threshold levels.

b) Is stable in the high pH, amine, environment of the morpholine/DIGLYCOLAMINE® product effluent.

c) Remains an active methanation catalyst in said environment for extended periods, particularly at the temperature of DEG amination (190°-250° C.).

d) Does not convert the desired morpholine and DIGLYCOLAMINE® to unwanted by-products, as a result of catalyzing secondary reactions in the crude product effluent. ##STR1##

There is art pertaining to hydrogenation/dehydrogenation catalysts. In U.S. Pat. No. 4,508,896 there is described a process for simultaneously producing a 2-(2-aminoalkoxy)alkanol compound and a morpholine compound by contacting oxydialkanol with ammonia in the presence of a hydrogenation/dehydrogenation catalyst. In that process a hydrogenation catalyst was used which comprised about 60-85 mole % nickel, 14-37 mole % copper and 1-6 mole % chromium calculated on an oxide-free basis. This work does not address the problem of a methanation catalyst, CO₂ production and its effect in lowering productivity. In said U.S. Pat. No. 4,508,896 to Templeton the hydrogenation/dehydrogenation catalyst is operated at a temperature of about 190° C. to 230° C. and a pressure of about 700 psig to about 2200 psig.

No art has been found dealing with a provision for converting by-product CO₂ to methane when said CO₂ is present in an amination product effluent, particularly where the CO₂ is present in a morpholine/DIGLYCOLAMINE® amine product mix resulting from the amination of diethylene glycol (DEG) with ammonia.

It is known that carbon dioxide can be converted into methane by reduction with four moles of hydrogen (Equation 3). This is called the "Sabatier reaction". The mechanism for the reaction is not clear and early researchers assumed the reaction occurred in stages, however Bardet and Trambouze reported in work in C. R. Hebd. Seances. Acad. Sci., Ser. C. 288 (1979), 101, that it appeared CO₂ methanation had its own mechanism, distinct from CO methanation, and that CO₂ methanation occurs faster and at lower temperatures than methanation of CO. Heterogeneous catalysts have proven best for this process, see "Carbon Dioxide Activation by Metal Complexes," by A. Behr, Chapter 4, p. 85 (1988).

The mechanism for hydrogenation of CO₂ on nickel is discussed in an article titled, "Hydrogenation of CO₂ on Group VIII Metals II. Kinetics and Mechanism of CO₂ Hydrogenation on Nickel," G. D. Weatherbee, et al., J. Catal., 77, 460-472 (1982). The rate of CO₂ hydrogenation was measured as a function of H₂ and CO₂ partial pressures at 500-600 K, 140 kPa and 30,000-90,000 h⁻¹. The data indicated the rate of CO₂ hydrogenation is moderately dependent on CO₂ and H₂ concentrations at low partial pressures but essentially concentration independent at high partial pressures. Under typical conditions CO was observed as a product of the reaction at levels determined by quasi-equilibrium between surface and gas phase CO species. Addition of CO to the reactants above this equilibrium level caused a significant decrease in the rate of CO₂ hydrogenation apparently as a result of product inhibition.

These authors set forth the following table which in their view summarized the mechanism for CO₂ hydrogenation and accounted for the observations of this study and other recent studies.

    ______________________________________                                         Proposed Sequence of Elementary Steps in CO.sub.2                              Methanation.sup.a                                                              Reaction                                                                       ______________________________________                                          H.sub.2 (g) + S                                                                               ##STR2##  2HS                                                   CO(g) + 2S                                                                                    ##STR3##  COS + OS                                              COS                                                                                           ##STR4##  CO(g) + S                                             COS +                                                                                         ##STR5##  CS + OS                                               CS + HS                                                                                       ##STR6##  CHS + S                                               CHS + HS                                                                                      ##STR7##  CH.sub.2S + S                                         CH.sub.2S + HS                                                                                ##STR8##  CH.sub.3S + S                                         CH.sub.3S + HS                                                                                ##STR9##  CH.sub.4S + S                                         CH.sub.4S                                                                                     ##STR10##                                                                                CH.sub.4 (g) + S                                      OS + HS                                                                                       ##STR11##                                                                                OHS + S                                               OHS + HS                                                                                      ##STR12##                                                                                H.sub.2 OS + S                                        H.sub.12 OS                                                                                   ##STR13##                                                                                H.sub.2 O(g) + S                                     ______________________________________                                          .sup.a S refers to a surface site.                                       

The authors also noted that kinetic studies of methanation in their laboratory provided evidence that there are several mechanistic regimes involving different rate controlling steps, the importance of which depends mainly on temperature.

The authors proposed that at moderate reaction temperatures (525°-575° K.), CO dissociation appeared to be rate controlling while hydrogenation of carbon apparently controlled at higher reaction temperatures (>575° K.). This suggested that CO and CO₂ methanation rates on nickel are both controlled by CO dissociation at moderate reaction temperatures (525-575° K.), a hypothesis consistent with the observation of nearly identical specific reaction rates in CO₂ and CO methanation on Ni/SiO₂. The authors further proposed that it is possible for the two reactions to follow similar paths and still have different rate determining steps.

CO₂ Methanation catalysts are discussed in an article titled "Highly Active Catalysts For CO₂ Methanation To Provide The Second Reactor Of Two Stage Process For High BTU SNG Synthesis", A. D. Tomsett, et al., Applied Catal. 26 391 (1986). This investigation was made in the context of identifying highly active catalysts suitable for the second of two stages in a process for conversion of syngas to high BTU substituted natural gas. It was found that supported Ni-La₂ O₃ -Ru catalysts are effective for CO₂ methanation. These catalysts provided high activity and complete conversion of CO₂ to methane at as low a temperature as 250° C.

It was concluded that the high activity of the Ni-La₂ O₃ -Ru catalysts is mainly ascribable to the large number of active sites.

It is known that methanation reactions are the reverse of reforming reactions. The methanation reactions are exothermic and, therefore, since a methanator typically operates in the temperature range of 300°-400° C. the CO and CO₂ at the inlet should be carefully monitored to avoid damage to catalyst and vessel, see Kirk-Othmer, Encyclopedia of Chem. Tech., 3rd Edition, Vol. 2, p. 494.

Related art includes an investigation discussed in an article titled "Hydrogenation of CO₂ over Co/Cu/K Catalysts", H. Baussart, et al., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I, 83, 1711 (1987). Here Co, K and Cu, as components of catalysts were investigated for the specific roles each played in the hydrogenation of CO₂. The results indicated, inter alia that a steady state was reached after ca. 30 hours of activation. It was found that the presence of cobalt favored the formation of alkanes, and that the presence of potassium favored the formation of CO resulting from a reverse water-gas shift reaction (CO₂ +H₂ →CO+H₂ O). Further, it appeared the presence of copper in Russell catalysts increased the activity and the selectivity for CH₄ and reduced the number of products.

There is a report on results of investigations into potassium-promoted nickel catalysts by T. K. Campbell, et al., Applied Catal., 50, 189 (1989). It was found potassium did not increase higher hydrocarbon or olefin selectivity, but it changed the CH₄ /CO product distribution. It was also found that potassium did not change CO₂ methanation mechanism and the mechanism appeared to be quite similar to that for CO hydrogenation. This paper presented steady-state kinetic data for CO₂ hydrogenation on Ni/SiO₂ and Ni/SiO₂ -Al₂ O₃ catalysts for a range of potassium concentrations. It was reported that hydrogenation reactions of CO₂ and CO on potassium promoted nickel catalysts are similar:

The activities and selectivities depend significantly on the support.

The rate of methanation on Ni/SiO₂ decreases exponentially for both reactions with potassium addition.

The rate of methanation on Ni/SiO₂ -Al₂ O₃ initially increases for both reactions with potassium addition.

Preoxidized rhodium was studied as a catalyst for methanation of carbon monoxide in an article titled "Methanation of Carbon Dioxide over Preoxidized Rhodium", A. Amariglio, et al., J. Catal., 81 247 (1983). The authors confirmed that according to their experiments preoxidation of Rh caused a dramatic enhancement of its activity in the methanation of CO₂. They estimated preoxidation allowed the rate to be increased by a factor of 100 at the lowest estimate. The authors also concluded that the deactivation, observed upon prolonged exposures to H₂, must be ascribed to the depletion of the preincorporated oxygen.

There is some information available regarding the use of ruthenium in a system structured for methanation alone. In an article entitled "Carbon Dioxide and Carbon Monoxide Methanation by Supported Ruthenium Catalysts", J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun., 955 (1982) by Helen Ferkul, et al., there is a discussion of ruthenium carbonyl clusters as active catalysts for the methanation of both carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. The various carbonyl clusters were placed on different supports, such as λ-alumina, silica gel or Na-Y zeolite. Added solvents were removed under reduced pressure and the catalyst systems containing 1% by weight of metal were activated by heating to 200° C. in a stream of hydrogen. Catalytic activities were determined by passing synthesis gas through the catalysts in the temperature range of 200°-400° C. and space velocity of 1000-3750^(h-1). The major hydrocarbon product was methane. Though traces of C₂ -C₄ hydrocarbons were also obtained, the yields of C₂ -C₆ hydrocarbons apparently observed by others under similar conditions were not observed. (See T. Okuhara, et al., J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1981, 1114). It was found that the best yields were obtained with Ru₃ (CO)₁₂ on alumina. Comparison with the well-known RuCl₃.3H₂ O- Al₂ O₃ system showed that it did not deactivate as fast.

Additional information regarding the use of catalysts for CO₂ methanation is found in an article by C. L. Thomas, entitled "Catalytic Processes and proven Catalysts", Academic Press., p. 116. It is noted that the most common ones are nickel. Many of the properties of the nickel catalysts are discussed along with disadvantages of using them in this type reaction. It is noted that in addition to nickel, platinum and ruthenium are used for methanation. There is no discussion here of the ruthenium catalyst.

From the art available it is evident that there are many factors and multiple variables involved in the methanation of CO₂, such that it would be difficult to identify a catalyst which would promote methanation at low temperatures (<250° C.) and high pH within a dual catalyst system where the conditions are geared toward a primary reaction, such as selective amination.

It would constitute a distinct advance in the art if a catalyst system were available whereby CO₂ formation could be suppressed during morpholine/DGA amine processing by amination of DEG under anhydrous conditions. It has been discovered that not just any methanation catalyst could be used in this fashion because of certain critical factors, particularly those outlined supra.

Unexpectedly it has been discovered that a dual catalyst system comprising a nickel in conjunction with a supported ruthenium catalyst is very effective for selective amination of DEG to morpholine plus DIGLYCOLAMINE® amine while at the same time significantly suppressing the coproduction of CO₂.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to the broad aspect of this invention morpholine and DIGLYCOLAMINE® amine are simultaneously produced while at the sometime CO₂ production is substantially suppressed by a process comprising contacting diethylene glycol, ammonia and hydrogen in the presence of a dual nickel/ruthenium catalyst comprising nickel-copper-chromium oxide in conjunction with a supported ruthenium catalyst at a temperature of 150° C. to 300° C. and pressure ranging from 200 to 5000 psi under anhydrous feed conditions, in the presence of a substantial quantity of hydrogen, and recovering the products.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

According to the preferred embodiment, oxydiethanol, also known as diethylene glycol, is fed into a reactor under anhydrous conditions and contacted with ammonia and hydrogen in the presence of a catalytically effective amount of a dual catalyst system comprising an amination/hydrogenation/dehydrogenation catalyst and a methanation catalyst, wherein the amination/hydrogenation/dehydrogenation catalyst consists of an oxide of 60 to 85 mole % nickel, about 14 to 37 mole % copper and 1 to 6 mole % chromium, and the methanation catalyst comprises a supported ruthenium catalyst.

The reaction takes place in a continuous process and contacting of the reactants is accomplished at a temperature of from 150° C. to about 300° C. and at a pressure of about 200 psig to about 5000 psig. The molar ratio of ammonia to oxydiethanol is preferably from about 4:1 to about 8:1 and the space velocities of the liquid feed material, i.e. ammonia and oxydiethanol, are from about 1 g of liquid feed per hour per milliliter of catalyst to about 6 g of liquid feed per hour per milliliter of catalyst. The recovered reaction product, consisting primarily of DIGLYCOLAMINE® amine and morpholine, is recovered from the resultant crude reaction product by conventional means such as distillation, extraction and the like.

The oxydialkanol compound that can be utilized in practicing the instant invention can be of the general formula: ##STR14## wherein each R is, independently, a hydrogen or a lower alkyl radical, such as, for example, methyl, ethyl or the like. The examples demonstrate the effectiveness of oxydiethanol or diethylene glycol.

The catalyst for amination of diethylene glycol which may be employed in practicing the invention may generally be characterized as an amination catalyst or as an amination/hydrogenation catalyst. Examples include copper, nickel, chromium, cobalt, manganese, molybdenum, palladium, platinum, rhodium, oxides of such metals and mixtures thereof. A particularly preferred catalyst is characterized by having the composition calculated in mole % of from about 60-85% nickel, 14-37% copper and 1-6% chromium with the preferred proportions being about 72-78% nickel, 20-25% copper and 1-3% chromium. A greatly preferred hydrogenation catalyst is one in which the active components consist essentially of about 75 mole % nickel, about 23 mole % copper and about 2 mole % chromium in the form of an oxide.

A commercially available amination/hydrogenation catalyst fitting this description is Engelhard Ni-2715 T 3/16". Engelhard Ni-2715 is a nickel-based catalyst produced by Engelhard which contains a nickel-copper-chromium oxide.

As mentioned only certain combinations of nickel-ruthenium based dual catalyst systems are effective in suppressing CO₂ formation during morpholine service and it has been surprisingly discovered in the instant invention that an effective methanation catalyst in combination with the nickel-copper-chromium oxide catalyst, is a specified class of supported ruthenium catalysts. Said supports may be selected from the elements of the Group II, III and IV or oxides thereof. The preferred supports include carbon, magnesia, alumina, silica, zirconia and titania, as well as mixtures thereof. The most preferred support is carbon.

The ruthenium may be added to said support by any of the usual methods and said formulated catalyst may comprise from 0.01 to 30 wt % ruthenium. The preferred ruthenium loading is 0.1 to 10.0 wt %, and the preferred catalyst formulation comprises 0.5 to 5.0 wt % ruthenium-on-carbon. Suitable commercially-available catalysts include Engelhard's 0.5% ruthenium-on-granular carbon. Where the support is alumina, the preferred ruthenium loading is 0.1 to 10 wt %.

The order of activity of the different ruthenium cocatalysts appears to be 1% Ru/C˜0.5% Ru/C>5% Ru/Al₂ O₃ ≈0.5 Ru/Al₂ O₃.

Said combination of nickel/ruthenium dual catalysts may be used in any proportions except that preferably the nickel-copper-chromium oxide catalyst should contact the diethylene glycol/ammonia feed first, in order to achieve the desired amination (Equations 1 and 2), then after the desired DEG conversion is achieved, the reactant product should contact the supported ruthenium catalyst in order to significantly lower the CO₂ effluent concentration (through Reaction 3).

A particularly effective ratio of nickel-copper-chromium oxide catalyst to supported ruthenium catalyst is in the range 1:1 to 10:1 by volume. The accompanying examples illustrate such a ratio range. A particularly preferred dual nickel catalyst combination is Engelhard Ni-2715 T 3/16" and 0.5 wt % ruthenium-on-carbon.

The ratio of reactant, i.e. the ratio of ammonia to oxydiethanol, or other oxydialkanol used in this process is 1:1 to about 10:1 although a molar excess of ammonia produces increased yields of the morpholine product. Optimum yields are obtained when the molar ratio of ammonia to oxydiethanol is about 6:1.

The space velocities of the feed, namely, the ammonia and the glycol, may vary from about 1 gram of the liquid feed/hour/milliliter of catalyst, to about 6 grams of liquid feed/hour/milliliter of catalyst. As noted above, the temperature range for the present invention is between 150° C. and 300° C., the preferred range is 200° to 250° C., depending upon the reactant ratios utilized.

Those skilled in the art will realize that an outstanding advantage of the instant process resides in the fact that the relative yields of morpholine and DIGLYCOLAMINE® amine can be varied by a slight variation of reaction conditions while the production rate of the combined products remains high. Thus, one can achieve a substantial yield of 2-(2-aminoethoxy)ethanol while simultaneously maintaining morpholine production rates comparable to or better than those obtained by previously known methods. In addition, no substantial by-products are formed.

The process should be carried out in a reductive atmosphere using hydrogen for commercial operations. Although small amounts of hydrogen are present during the reaction from the catalyst materials and as a by-product, it is preferred that hydrogen be added in the feed system in order of achieved CO₂ methanation (Equation 3) and to maintain catalytic activity. The quantity of hydrogen necessary for the practice of this invention is generally in the range of from 0.1 to 1000 liters (1) per lb of DEG converted, the preferred range is from 10 to 200 liters H₂ per lb of DEG converted. Such a ratio is illustrated in the accompanying examples. Data for the combination of Engelhard Ni-2715T and ruthenium-on-carbon show CO₂ production may be suppressed by a factor of >2 where the DEG conversion is ca. 80% and by a factor of ca. 5, when the H₂ flow rate is raised from 35 liters to 90 liters/hr.

The quantity of CO₂ produced in this morpholine/DIGLYCOLAMINE® amine process is normally measured in terms of parts per million (ppm) in the effluent product and is expressed in terms of lbs of CO₂ generated per 100M lb of DEG converted.

The accompanying examples illustrate the following:

1) In Example I, the generation of morpholine plus DIGLYCOLAMINE® (DGA® amine) is demonstrated using a dual catalyst system comprising a nickel-copper-chromium oxide catalyst in combination with a ruthenium-on-carbon to achieve:

a) At normal hydrogen flows, 81% DEG conversion at 215° C. with 248 lb CO₂ produced per 100M lb. DEG converted (see Table I).

b) At 2.6 times normal hydrogen flows, ca 85% DEG conversion at 215° C. with 93-109 lb CO₂ produced per 100M lb DEG converted.

2) In Examples 2 and 3, similar combinations with other ruthenium-on-carbon catalysts typically give:

a) At normal hydrogen flow rates, 80% DEG conversion at 215° C. with 224 lb CO₂ produced per 100M lb DEG converted (see Table III).

b) 2.6 times normal hydrogen flows, on 90% DEG conversion at 220° C. with 88-102 lb CO₂ produced per 100M lb DEG converted.

3) In Examples 4 and 5, combinations of the Ni-Cu-Cr catalyst with ruthenium-on-alumina catalyst typically give:

a) At normal hydrogen flow rates, 75% DEG conversion at 210° C. with 251 lb CO₂ produced per 100M lb DEG converted (see Table IV).

b) At 2-6 times normal hydrogen flows, ca. 88% DEG conversion at 220° C. with 226-231 lb CO₂ produced per 100M lb DEG converted.

4) By comparison, in comparative Example A, using only Ni-2715 T 3/16", when DEG is aminated at 220° C. with 82% DEG conversion, production of by-product CO₂ is 499 lb per M lb DEG converted.

5) In Example 6, combinations of the Ni-Cu-Cr catalyst with ruthenium-on-carbon catalyst provide improved CO₂ suppression during a typical 500 hr experiment.

EXAMPLE 1

To a 55 cc plug-flow reactor fitted with heating, cooling and pressure control devices and constructed of stainless steel, was charged a combination of 400 cc of pelleted nickel-copper-chromium oxide catalyst (in which the active components consisted essentially of 71.2 wt % Ni, 12.3 wt % Cu and 73.3% reduced Ni) and 150 cc of granular ruthenium (0.5%) on carbon, 4-12 mesh. The pelleted nickel-copper-chromium oxide catalyst was placed in the bottom section of the reactor and the ruthenium-on-carbon at the top.

Diethyleneglycol (1.2 lbs/hr), ammonia (2.4 lbs/hr) and hydrogen (35 liter/hr) were fed separately to the reactor system from the bottom of the reactor, in an upflow mode, through the catalyst bed of the reactor. The reactor effluent was cooled, depressurized and the gaseous and liquid product analyzed after a 48 hour prerun period to establish steady state conditions, the performance of the dual-catalyst system was tested at a series of operating temperatures (210°-230° C.) and hydrogen flow rates (35-90 liters/hr) while maintaining a back pressure of 2200 psig.

Data and results from this run are summarized in Table I. It may be noted that in this run:

At an operating temperature of 215° C., the DEG conversion is 80.6% and the CO₂ production is 248 lbs per 100M lb of DEG converted.

While at 220° C. temperature, when the hydrogen flow rate is raised to 90 liters/hr, the CO₂ effluent production drops to 93-109 lbs per 100M lb of DEG converted.

                                      TABLE I                                      __________________________________________________________________________                                      CO.sub.2 (lbs)                                             DEG            Effluent                                                                            Per                                           H.sub.2 Flow                                                                           Reaction                                                                            Conver-                                                                             Yield (%) Basis                                                                          CO.sub.2                                                                            100 M lbs                                     Rate    Temp.                                                                               sion DEG Converted                                                                            Conc.                                                                               DEG Con-                                      EX.                                                                               (l/hr)                                                                              (°C.)                                                                        (%)  Morpholine                                                                           DGA (ppm)                                                                               verted                                        __________________________________________________________________________     1.sup.a                                                                           35   210  64.5 49.0  45.2                                                                               .sup.b                                                                              .sup.b                                           35   215  80.6 69.6  25.6                                                                               190  248                                              35   220  86.9 75.5  18.8                                                                               305  357                                              35   230  95.0 84.3  9.3 790  856                                              90   220  84   68    15  92   109                                              90   220  85.9 74    15  80   93                                            __________________________________________________________________________      .sup.a Catalyst combination: Ni--Cu--Cr (400 cc) + 0.5% Ru/C, 4-12 Mesh        (150 cc).                                                                      .sup.b Not determined.                                                   

EXAMPLES 2-3

Following the operating procedures of Example 1, two combinations of the nickel-copper-chromium oxide catalyst of Example 1 with different ruthenium-on-carbon catalysts (A 0.5% Ru/C, 30×40 mesh, and a 1% ruthenium-on-carbon, granules) were tested for diethylene glycol amination over a range of operating temperatures (210°-230° C.) and the different hydrogen flow rates (35 and 90 liters/hr).

Data and results from these runs are summarized in Tables II and III. It may be noted that:

a) At normal hydrogen flow rates, 80% DEG conversion per pass is achieved at 215° C., with 224 lb CO₂ produced for each 100M lb DEG converted (see Table III).

b) At 2.6 times the normal hydrogen flows, ca. 90% DEG conversion is achieved at 220° C., with 88-102 lb CO₂ produced per 100M lb DEG converted.

                                      TABLE II                                     __________________________________________________________________________                                      CO.sub.2 (lbs)                                             DEG            Effluent                                                                            Per                                           H.sub.2 Flow                                                                           Reaction                                                                            Conver-                                                                             Yield (%) Basis                                                                          CO.sub.2                                                                            100 M lbs                                     Rate    Temp.                                                                               sion DEG Converted                                                                            Conc.                                                                               DEG Con-                                      EX.                                                                               (l/hr)                                                                              (°C.)                                                                        (%)  Morpholine                                                                           DGA (ppm)                                                                               verted                                        __________________________________________________________________________     2.sup.a                                                                           35   210  67.3 56.1  39.4                                                                               112  162                                              35   215  73.7 62.1  33.1                                                                               136  152                                              35   220  82.5 70.1  24.8                                                                               236  237                                              35   230  91.4 79.7  13.3                                                                               790  832                                              90   220  79.8 72.7  19.9                                                                               97   124                                              90   220  80.8 71.2  19.8                                                                               110  140                                           __________________________________________________________________________      .sup.a Catalyst combination: Ni--Cu--Cr (400 cc) + 0.5% Ru/C, 30 ×       40 Mesh (150 cc).                                                        

                                      TABLE III                                    __________________________________________________________________________                                      CO.sub.2 (lbs)                                             DEG            Effluent                                                                            Per                                           H.sub.2 Flow                                                                           Reaction                                                                            Conver-                                                                             Yield (%) Basis                                                                          CO.sub.2                                                                            100 M lbs                                     Rate    Temp.                                                                               sion DEG Converted                                                                            Conc.                                                                               DEG Con-                                      EX.                                                                               (l/hr)                                                                              (°C.)                                                                        (%)  Morpholine                                                                           DGA (ppm)                                                                               verted                                        __________________________________________________________________________     3.sup.a                                                                           35   210  72.1 61.2  34.1                                                                               102  153                                              35   215  80.4 68.4  26.6                                                                               167  224                                              35   220  85.2 73.4  21.6                                                                               282  344                                              35   230  95.6 85.2  8.8 931  992                                              90   220  90.4 77.3  12.9                                                                               75   88                                               90   220  90.4 78.8  11.8                                                                               87   102                                           __________________________________________________________________________      .sup.a Catalyst combination: Ni--Cu--Cr (400 cc) + 1% Ru/C, granules (50       cc).                                                                     

EXAMPLES 4-5

Following the operating procedures of Example 1, two combinations of the nickel-copper-chromium oxide catalyst of Example 1 with different ruthenium-on-alumina catalysts (a 5% ruthenium-on-alumina, 1/8" diameter extrudates and 0.5% ruthenium-on-alumina, 1/8" diameter spheres) were tested for diethylene glycol amination over a range of operating temperatures (210°-250° C.) and, in one case, different hydrogen flow rates (35 and 90 liters/hr).

Data and results from these runs are summarized in Table IV and V. It may be noted that typically:

a) At normal hydrogen flows, 75% DEG conversion per pass is achieved at 210° C., with 251 lb of CO₂ produced per 100M lb DEG converted (see Table IV).

b) At 2.6 times the normal hydrogen flows, ca. 88% DEG conversion is achieved at 220° C., with 226-231 lb CO₂ produced per 100M lb DEG converted.

                                      TABLE IV                                     __________________________________________________________________________                                      CO.sub.2 (lbs)                                             DEG            Effluent                                                                            Per                                           H.sub.2 Flow                                                                           Reaction                                                                            Conver-                                                                             Yield (%) Basis                                                                          CO.sub.2                                                                            100 M lbs                                     Rate    Temp.                                                                               sion DEG Converted                                                                            Conc.                                                                               DEG Con-                                      EX.                                                                               (l/hr)                                                                              (°C.)                                                                        (%)  Morpholine                                                                           DGA (ppm)                                                                               verted                                        __________________________________________________________________________     4.sup.a                                                                           35   210  74.7 63.0  31.1                                                                               179  251                                              35   215  .sup.b                                                                              .sup.b                                                                               .sup.b                                                                             279  393                                              35   220  84.9 73.3  21.4                                                                               440  543                                              35   230  94.5 84.1  9.8 1241 1375                                             90   220  88.4 77.6  13.0                                                                               212  226                                              90   220  87.1 75.9  14.7                                                                               178  231                                           __________________________________________________________________________      .sup.a Catalyst combination: Ni--Cu--Cr (400 cc) + 5% Ru/alumina, E1/8"        (150 cc).                                                                      .sup.b Not determined                                                    

                                      TABLE V                                      __________________________________________________________________________                                      CO.sub.2 (lbs)                                             DEG            Effluent                                                                            Per                                           H.sub.2 Flow                                                                           Reaction                                                                            Conver-                                                                             Yield (%) Basis                                                                          CO.sub.2                                                                            100 M lbs                                     Rate    Temp.                                                                               sion DEG Converted                                                                            Conc.                                                                               DEG Con-                                      EX.                                                                               (l/hr)                                                                              (°C.)                                                                        (%)  Morpholine                                                                           DGA (ppm)                                                                               verted                                        __________________________________________________________________________     5.sup.a                                                                           35   210  52.5 45.7  51.4                                                                               90   182                                              35   220  83.0 75.6  20.7                                                                               330  419                                              35   230  93.0 83.0  11.1                                                                               510  531                                              35   240  94.5 78.0  9.8 2770 3060                                             35   250  96.7 80.4  7.3 3190 3534                                          __________________________________________________________________________      .sup.a Catalyst combination: Ni--Cu--Cr (400 cc) + 0.5% Ru/Alumina, S1/8"      (150 cc).                                                                

EXAMPLE 6

Following the procedures of Example 1, the combination of nickel-copper-chromium oxide catalyst with 0.5% ruthenium-on-carbon, granular, catalyst was tested for diethylene glycol amination over a period of 500 hrs. Data and results from this run are summarized in Table VI. It may be noted that:

1) The dual Ni-Ru catalyst continues to suppress CO₂ effluent concentrations and actually becomes more effective as the run progresses. After 400 hrs, the CO₂ effluent concentrations are below normal threshold levels.

2) The DEG conversion level remains high--from ca. 88% to 80%--over the life of the catalyst.

                                      TABLE VI                                     __________________________________________________________________________                                     CO.sub.2 (lb)                                                                  per                                            Time on   DEG conv.                                                                            Product yield, %                                                                         CO.sub.2 conc.                                                                       100 M lb                                       EX.                                                                               stream (hrs)                                                                          %     Morpholine                                                                           DGA (ppm) DEG conv.                                      __________________________________________________________________________     6.sup.a                                                                           22     88.7  78.8  14.6                                                                               189   233                                               70     87.9  79.2  14.5                                                                               126   151                                               100    85.6  75.5  17.9                                                                               125   167                                               171    83.5  73.6  20.1                                                                               112   143                                               203    82.1  72.6  21.5                                                                               165   210                                               203    82.1  72.6  21.5                                                                               165   210                                               273    81.8  72.5  22.0                                                                               108   146                                               303    83.1  73.8  20.0                                                                               116   153                                               375    82.5  72.9  20.9                                                                               126   155                                               401    80.2  68.7  23.9                                                                               29    37                                                449    80.8  70.2  23.6                                                                               31    40                                                484    79.7  69.0  24.9                                                                               24    31                                             __________________________________________________________________________      .sup.a Catalyst combination: Ni--Cu--Cr (400 cc) + 0.5% Ru/C, 4-12 mesh        (150 cc).                                                                

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE A

Following the operating procedures of Example 1, the 550 cc plug flow reactor was filled with the nickel-copper-chromium oxide catalyst alone and diethylene glycol amination was conducted at feed rates of 1.2 lb/hr DEG, 2.4 lb/hr of ammonia and 35 liters/hr of hydrogen. Again the operating temperature and pressure were 220° C. and 220 psi respectively.

Analyses of the liquid and gas products show:

DEG Conversion - 82%

Yield of Morpholine - 65.3%

Yield Of DGA - 30.3%

Effluent Conc. CO₂ - 689 ppm

CO₂ Per 100M Lbs DEG Converted - 499 lbs 

What is claimed is:
 1. A process for simultaneously producing morpholine and DIGLYCOLAMINE® amine while suppressing CO₂ formation comprising the steps of:reacting anhydrous diethylene glycol with ammonia in the presence of added hydrogen over a dual nickel/ruthenium catalyst system consisting essentially of a nickel-copper-chromium oxide catalyst in combination with a supported ruthenium catalyst at a temperature of from about 150° C. to about 300° C. and a pressure of from about 200 psig to about 5000 psig.
 2. The process of claim 1 wherein the ruthenium catalyst comprises 0.1 to 10 ruthenium.
 3. The process of claim 2 wherein the ruthenium catalyst support is selected from the group comprising carbon, alumina, silica, titania, zirconia, and magnesia, as well as mixtures thereof.
 4. The process of claim 3 wherein the support is carbon.
 5. The process of claim 1 wherein the nickel-copper-chromium oxide component of the dual catalyst comprises:60 to 85 mole percent nickel, 14 to 37 mole percent copper, 1to 6 mole percent chromium
 6. The process of claim 1 wherein the hydrogen flow is from 10 to 200 liters per lb of DEG converted.
 7. The process of claim 4 wherein the ruthenium-on-carbon catalyst comprises 0.5 to 5.0 ruthenium.
 8. In a process for simultaneously producing morpholine plus DIGLYCOLAMINE® amine, the improvement of suppressing carbon dioxide formation by:reacting anhydrous diethylene glycol with ammonia in the presence of added hydrogen over a dual nickel/ruthenium catalyst which consists essentially of a nickel-copper-chromium oxide catalyst comprising 72-78% nickel, 20-25% copper and 1-3% chromium in combination with a supported ruthenium catalyst consisting essentially of 0.5-5.0% ruthenium on a support selected from the group consisting of carbon or alumina, at a pressure of 200 psi to 5000 psi and a temperature from 200° to 250° C., at hydrogen flow rates of from about 10 to 200 liters per lb. of DEG converted and isolating said morpholine and DIGLYCOLAMINE® amine products from the reaction products.
 9. The process of claim 8 wherein the ratio of nickel-copper-chromium oxide catalyst to ruthenium-based catalyst, is in the range of 1:1 to 10:1 by volume. 